FAS Model Study

The aim of this interdisciplinary pilot study was to systematically assess the physical infrastructure and safety standards of Saxony’s shelters for adults affected by domestic violence and their children, and to identify areas where action is required. The background to this is the quantitative shortfall in shelter places and, at the same time, the lack of a systematic analysis of the quality of existing facilities to date. The study combines architectural and social science perspectives and examines the extent to which spatial conditions meet the professional requirements of social work. The results form a professional basis for qualitative and quantitative developments of the protection system, as well as for dialogue between practitioners, service providers, planners and policymakers.

The study was conducted interdisciplinarily at the Faculty of Architecture and Social Sciences in three phases. In Phase 1, professional requirements for social work were systematically derived from the literature and translated into necessary functional areas and spaces. In Phase 2, the existing situation was assessed using the environmental psychology approach of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) in 12 facilities (20 sites) in Saxony. During site visits, objective measurements of structural and spatial conditions were taken, and guided interviews were conducted with 21 professionals and 4 individuals seeking protection. The spatial layout, facilities, accessibility and security were analysed. In Phase 3, opportunities for further development and a structural design for an ‘ideal’ shelter were developed based on the theoretical and empirical findings.

The study shows that none of the properties analysed fully meets the ideal requirements for social work in shelters. Shortcomings are evident across all criteria analysed. At the same time, it becomes clear that the coverage of the necessary functional areas differs significantly between shelters and safe housing, meaning that professional requirements can be implemented to varying degrees within these structures. Overall, alongside quantitative expansion, there is a need for qualitative development. The findings provide specific requirements for spaces and facilities, as well as structural proposals for new builds and existing stock. They can serve as a basis for funding decisions, the updating of national strategies, the planning of new facilities, and for refurbishment and adaptation processes in existing buildings. Furthermore, they support providers and professionals in their professional reflection and justification of structural and spatial requirements.